New guy, 98 Deluxe, 1 owner
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:06 pm
Hey all, found you by accident!
Finally got over 'too stubborn for youtube', watched a mess of guitar vids, and got my Parker out again.
It is a '98 Deluxe, antique gold I believe it is called. I bought it from Boykins here in Richmond, Va - they finally failed recently. Anyway, they were authorized dealers, and came across a load off a wrecked truck. So I picked the best looking and subtle one, with correct hard case and bullwinkle.
I sold (and had been playing) an 11 pound Strat, thus is under 5, thus the appeal for an old man.
So..., this week I found a NOS 9 in the case, and a broken 11 (with a note from self to ask the factory for a replacement - that ship...) I have an interior mark aligned with the 11 remains, so though I do not remember it, I guess I was very lucky in the past.
1. Anyone else receive 9/11 pair in a new guitar?
I have a bunch of 'tonewood' scraps from my (passed) dad's lutherie hobby, and apparently I jammed a rosewood block in to replace the 11 when it broke.
Changing strings, reading here, reading the manual, videos and such got me to checking setups with and without the 9 strings, and the 9 spring or the block. I have checked everything I can for clearance, parallel, and perpendicular , and the following remains:
My bridge descender (3 cut piece) button, when string area is parallel to neck/strings, misses the switch block by about an 1/8. When I jam the button into the block and the bridge (neck side) rises, the string area will buzz on a healthy low E strum. So, I decided parallel and perpendicular were more important, and wedged stock between block and button. Reading up here, I rechecked bridge post inserts for perpendicular and can find no error. I suspect this may have led to the over-stressed spring in the past - trying to get the button to the block.
2. Anyone have a similar. er, error?
I am a life long 'rhythm' player, never used a tremolo arm ever, so a 'blocked' solution will be fine for me. But it seems it would require pushing against the tailstock, to the descender/button and shim, and on to the neck area of the cutout to 'jam' the button so as to locate the bridge position. So, in other words, not only a block, but an adjustable block so as to set descender position within the block - whew!
3. Anyone have a solution that would not disassemble during string break/change?
THX for reading along, pics will follow!
Finally got over 'too stubborn for youtube', watched a mess of guitar vids, and got my Parker out again.
It is a '98 Deluxe, antique gold I believe it is called. I bought it from Boykins here in Richmond, Va - they finally failed recently. Anyway, they were authorized dealers, and came across a load off a wrecked truck. So I picked the best looking and subtle one, with correct hard case and bullwinkle.
I sold (and had been playing) an 11 pound Strat, thus is under 5, thus the appeal for an old man.
So..., this week I found a NOS 9 in the case, and a broken 11 (with a note from self to ask the factory for a replacement - that ship...) I have an interior mark aligned with the 11 remains, so though I do not remember it, I guess I was very lucky in the past.
1. Anyone else receive 9/11 pair in a new guitar?
I have a bunch of 'tonewood' scraps from my (passed) dad's lutherie hobby, and apparently I jammed a rosewood block in to replace the 11 when it broke.
Changing strings, reading here, reading the manual, videos and such got me to checking setups with and without the 9 strings, and the 9 spring or the block. I have checked everything I can for clearance, parallel, and perpendicular , and the following remains:
My bridge descender (3 cut piece) button, when string area is parallel to neck/strings, misses the switch block by about an 1/8. When I jam the button into the block and the bridge (neck side) rises, the string area will buzz on a healthy low E strum. So, I decided parallel and perpendicular were more important, and wedged stock between block and button. Reading up here, I rechecked bridge post inserts for perpendicular and can find no error. I suspect this may have led to the over-stressed spring in the past - trying to get the button to the block.
2. Anyone have a similar. er, error?
I am a life long 'rhythm' player, never used a tremolo arm ever, so a 'blocked' solution will be fine for me. But it seems it would require pushing against the tailstock, to the descender/button and shim, and on to the neck area of the cutout to 'jam' the button so as to locate the bridge position. So, in other words, not only a block, but an adjustable block so as to set descender position within the block - whew!
3. Anyone have a solution that would not disassemble during string break/change?
THX for reading along, pics will follow!